What Would You Like me to Learn at Apologetics Training?

I am looking forward to participating in the upcoming Cross-Examined Instructors Academy 2018 (“CIA”).  https://crossexamined.org/what-is-cia/

I will have the opportunity to train under the guidance of Frank Turek, J. Warner Wallace, Natasha Crain, Sean McDowell, and other top Apologists.

If you had the chance to ask any or all of them some questions on the subject of Apologetics, what would you ask?

What are the challenges from skeptics that you would most like help answering?

I will write one or more articles about this after I get back from Dallas.

Please send your questions and challenges to me at michael@msochartered.com.

Thank you!

Michael Oswald

michael@msochartered.com

www.msochartered.com

Michael Oswald is a follower of Jesus who lives in Boise, Idaho.  Unless otherwise specified, the opinions expressed in this article are his own.

© 2018 Michael S. Oswald

 

How do we Know Christianity is True?

Why the Truth of Christianity Matters.

Parents, do you know how to keep your kids from becoming Atheists when they go off to college? Start training them early on about all the reasons to believe Christianity is true.

Proverbs 22:6 tells us we are to “Train up a child in the way he should go, even when he is old he will not depart from it.”

Training is different from teaching, as J. Warner Wallace wrote in his book Forensic Faith. He used the illustration of preparing for a boxing match.  If you are only interested in learning about boxing, you can read a book on the subject.  However, once a boxing match has been placed on the calendar, the boxer immediately starts getting into physical and mental condition to win the match.

Think of your child’s first year of college as boxing match. She is going to be in an environment that is openly hostile to the Christian faith.  She needs to go through a long process of learning all the reasons to believe that Christianity is true. She also needs to practice the art of responding effectively to things that Atheists often say.

The popular culture is dominated by people who hold the Materialist world view.  Entertainment, education, and government all teach that faith is hostile to science and should not be allowed in the public square.  They define faith as “blind faith,” or “faith in spite of the evidence.”

Many of the people she will encounter will parrot things they hear popular Atheists such as Prof. Richard Dawkins say. Dawkins (among others) claims that faith is hostile to science. By respectfully asking (1) what do you mean by that? And (2) how did you come to that conclusion? It is possible to get them to realize that Atheism doesn’t have a very solid foundation. See the book Tactics by Greg Koukl for more on using what he calls The Columbo Tactic.

How Can We Know Christianity is True?

Frank Turek is co-author of the book I Don’t Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist.  He says you only have to answer four questions in the affirmative to know that Christianity is True:

  1. Does Truth Exist?

Post-modernists say there is no truth, while making the claim that post-modernism is true.

If someone says there is no such thing as truth, ask them: “Is that a true statement?”

If there is no truth, then anything written by an Atheist can’t be true.

You can’t get away from truth. It is objective and absolute.

  1. Does God Exist?

There is a lot of evidence God exists, including scientific, historical, and logical evidence.

The scientific evidence known as the Big Bang shows that time, space, and matter all had a beginning. There was nothing, and then the entire space-time continuum leapt into existence out of nothing.  (In the words of Aristotle, “Nothing is what rocks dream about.”)

Even Atheists admit that time, space, and matter had a beginning.  Logic and reason tell you that anything which comes into existence must have a cause (or a creator).  Nothing can cause itself to come into being.  Therefore, whatever caused time, space and matter to exist must be timeless, space-less, and immaterial.  It must also be personal, in order to make the choice to create something. It must also be incredibly intelligent and incredibly powerful to be able to create everything out of nothing.

  1. Are Miracles Possible?

The greatest miracle of all is in the first verse of the Bible – in the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.  If this is true, anything else that is not logically impossible is at least possible. Walking on water is easy for God – He created the water! God created life from non-life.  He can raise someone from the dead.

  1. Is the New Testament True?

Here is a summary of the reasons we can trust that the New Testament writers were telling the truth. The testimony was:

Eyewitness (the writers were either apostles of Jesus or people who spoke to the apostles and to others who knew Jesus);

Early (written while many other witnesses were available to refute any lies or errors);

Embarrassing (containing unflattering details the authors would not have invented);

Excruciating (some writers were tortured and killed for refusing to recant what they knew to be true about Jesus), and

Expected (the Old Testament contained many prophesies about the Messiah – see Isaiah Chapter 53).

If you are ready to sink your teeth into the evidence for the truth of Christianity, read the book I Don’t Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist.

 

 

Do All Religions Teach the Same Things?

A common myth permeating the secular culture is that all religions basically teach the same things, so Christianity isn’t really the only way to God (or to heaven, or to know the truth).

It is important to know that the different religions do NOT agree with that assertion. The basic beliefs of Pantheism, Islam, (and Materialism, for that matter) differ wildly from the Judeo-Christian worldview.

Further, only Christianity teaches salvation by grace and not by works.

Christian Apologist Ravi Zacharias (a former Hindu who grew up in India) is a master at helping separate fact from fiction in this regard.

I encourage everyone to view this brief (11:46) video with the unfortunate title “Ravi SCHOOLS a Skeptic at Yale University Q&A”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNuYJw_T350&t=134s

This title was selected by the person who posted the clip.  It was not one chosen by Ravi or his team at RZIM. I say the title is unfortunate because it is unnecessarily combative.  We are called to be winsome Apologists (please see my January 17, 2018 post on that very topic). 

In response to the question of “What entitles us to believe that the Christian Faith is the exclusive means to truth?” Ravi first defines truth and what it means to know the truth.

Starting at the 4:15 mark, he explains what makes Jesus unique.

The Gospel meta-narrative is unique.  Everything is designed to show that the problem with humanity is not outside ourselves, but inside ourselves. We have lost the purpose for which we were created, namely, to be in relationship with God.  Jesus said that the greatest commandment is to love the Lord with all your heart, soul, mind & strength, and love your neighbor as yourself.  On these two commands hang all the law and the prophets (in other words, the entire Old Testament). That imperative is unavailable from any other world view. We are made in the imago dei and are of infinite worth.  We are all creatures in need of forgiveness.

The four absolutes we look for (evil, justice, love, and forgiveness) are answered in the life, death, crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus. These attributes about Jesus were prophesied, predicted, and exactly fulfilled.

Why does this matter to Americans? Only the Judeo-Christian worldview supports the Declaration of Independence.” Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights”.  Pantheism doesn’t say that. Materialism doesn’t say that. Not even Islam says that. Only the Judeo-Christian worldview offers each of us intrinsic worth. Read the Gospel of John for the full story of Jesus.

Atheistic Materialism when taken to its honest and logical outworking ends with all life being nothing more than accident and chance. Even according to Atheist Richard Dawkins we are the products of blind pitiless indifference, machines of accidental happenstance. This logically means that things like morality, self- sacrifice, and justice are made up by humans and are of no real consequence. We know intrinsically that truth can be felt much more deeply by looking honestly at the world around us. We are not accidents of molecules bumping into one another, we are created beings of immense value and are loved by our Creator. Either human life has value and morality is just as real as the air we breathe, or it’s not and it’s just a difference of opinion between those who murder and those who love.

 

Are Atheists Smarter Than Christians?

Some high-profile Atheists such as Richard (The God Delusion) Dawkins assert that Atheists are smarter than Christians.  They start from the assumption that only unintelligent people would believe in a supernatural being. This assumption is rebutted by evidence such as the Christians who have won the Nobel Prize in Physics and Chemistry, led the Human Genome Project, etc., but it sounds plausible and is rarely challenged by journalists who interview Dawkins, et al.

In the latest Tru-ID podcast by Adam Coleman, Adam speaks with fellow Apologist Joel Furches. Starting at the 24:00 mark, Joel explains the importance of having Apologetics in the Churches.  Among other things, he addresses studies purportedly linking intelligence in academics to Atheism.

Joel has a background in Psychology and Education.  He describes how the education system is set up to reward those who are analytical and to discount those with other learning styles. Joel notes that people don’t think in just one way, so education should target all the ways people think. The people getting left in the dust are the intuiters. Joel notes that the average religious person tends to be more intuitive, while that average Atheist tends to be more analytical.

Joel noted that the higher one goes in education, the more one encounters hostility to religion. Joel asserts that the academy essentially manufactures Atheists.

Apologetics in the church gives the analytical thinkers (Christians and Atheists) something to chew on.

This is one of the most content-rich podcasts I’ve heard since I started paying attention to Apologetics.  Joel also addresses the Problem of Evil, about which I will have more to say in my next post.

The podcast is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhSNeqs3yg0

© 2018 Michael S. Oswald

The “Minimal Facts” Approach to the New Testament

How do you respond to a skeptic who asserts that Jesus never existed, or if He did, He certainly never rose from the dead?

Dr. Gary Habermas created an approach to help those skeptics at least be willing to consider that there is reliable historical evidence for the resurrection of Jesus.  He dubbed it the “Minimal Facts” approach.

Dr. Habermas developed this method while doing research for his Ph.D. at Michigan State University.  He noticed that there are five facts about the resurrection that Biblical scholars (including Atheists and Agnostics) accept as true:

  1. Jesus died.
  2. His disciples believed they saw the risen Jesus.
  3. James the skeptical brother also believed.
  4. Paul the persecutor also believed.
  5. Jesus’s tomb was empty.

I urge you to invest just under an hour to watch him lay out the approach and how he derived it.  I think he is a very entertaining and enlightening presenter!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMGLPR5X8MM Part 1 of 2 (29:57)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RISjr29gpaQ Part 2 of 2 (24:07)

Gary Habermas is the Distinguished Professor of Apologetics and Philosophy and chairman, Department of Philosophy and Theology, at Liberty University.

 

Biblical Justice

Sean McDowell and Thaddeus Williams are professors of Christian Apologetics and Theology, respectively, at Biola University. They recently discussed the vital question of how Christians should think about social justice. Below are the opening and closing portions of their conversation. Please join me in prayerfully considering how to apply this guidance in our daily lives.

(Bonus question: What does “Biola” mean? See the end of this post for the answer.)

“SEAN MCDOWELLThere has been significant focus on “social justice” within the Christian world over the past few years. What is the biblical call to justice?

THADDEUS WILLIAMS: If we take the Bible seriously then justice should be a big deal for us. God does not suggest, He commands that we “Do justice and righteousness, and deliver from the hand of the oppressor him who has been robbed” (Jer. 22:3). Jesus declared his mission to “proclaim good news to the poor… liberty to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty those who are oppressed” (Luke 4:18, quoting Isa. 61:1, 2). “Seek justice” (Isa. 1:17) is a clarion call of Scripture, and those who box their ears to that call are simply not living by the Book.

MCDOWELLWhen have you seen that lived out well in church history?

WILLIAMS: There is a long, beautiful history of Christians who lived out the biblical call to justice. The early church proclaimed the Gospel in a way that subverted the mutual racism between 1st century Jews, Samaritans, and Gentiles. They brought reconciliation and real community where there had been hostility and division for centuries.

When Romans tossed their so called “blemished” babies away like garbage—often simply because they were female—our ancient brothers and sisters went to those human dumps, rescued, and raised society’s unwanted as their own cherished sons and daughters. They knew God had rescued and adopted them, so they did the same until the human dumps were no more.

When a plague ravaged the Roman Empire, most people ran for the hills away from the sick and dying. It was counterculture Christians who ran to the bedsides of the plagued (most of them non-Christians who didn’t abide by Christian ethics, sexual or otherwise) to treat them with dignity, getting sick and dying right along with them. (Contrast that with the church’s response to the AIDS crisis in the 1980s!) Then there was Wilberforce, John Newton and the Clapham sect in the UK, along with Fredrick Douglas, Harriet Tubman, and others is the US. Their own experiences of redemption from sin inspired them to abolish the dehumanizing slave-trade. Christians like Charles Octavius Boothe and Dietrich Bonhoeffer used good theology to combat white supremacy. You might not know it from today’s headlines, but this long and biblically propelled justice tradition continues today all over the world.”

“MCDOWELLIf we want to carry forward that biblical justice tradition, should we jump aboard the current “social justice” movement?

WILLIAMS: That’s a massively important question. Of course, it all comes down to what we mean by “social justice.” We should all seek a world forever purged of racism, where justice prevails and greed and tyranny are permanently replaced with compassion and love. But we have to be discerning. Not every movement waving the social justice banner promotes the kind of justice and shalom the Bible calls us to seek.

The problem is not with the quest for justice. The problem is what happens when that quest is undertaken from a framework that is not compatible with the Bible. And this is a very real problem, because the extent to which we unwittingly allow unbiblical worldview assumptions to shape our approach to justice is the extent to which we are inadvertently hurting the very people we seek to help.

“culture war” model has taken over our culture. I see far more hope in the biblical insight that Jesus destroyed the wall of hostility between Jew and Gentile to make for Himself “one man,” uniting people from every tongue tribe, and nation and making them ambassadors of reconciliation. Family and reconciliation, not inter-group warfare, is the Bible’s model for justice. The church needs to step up and live that out in an obvious and compelling way, to show the watching world the beautiful alternative to mutual destruction.

If we really care about justice—which should be all of us who take the Bible seriously—then, no, we shouldn’t go along with ideologies that promise liberation and peace and only bring more bondage and strife. Instead we should love the oppressed (and love the God who loves the oppressed!) by carrying on the beautiful, biblical justice tradition of the Wilberforces and Tubmans and Boothes of history.”

Please read the whole interview here: http://seanmcdowell.org/blog/how-should-christians-think-about-social-justice

Answer: Bible Institute of Los Angeles.  See https://www.biola.edu/about/history

© 2018 Michael S. Oswald

 

 

 

 

Biblical Love

On this Valentine’s Day, let’s see what the Bible says about love.

(For an excellent comparison of Biblical love with the Greco-Roman concept of romantic love, see Voddie Baucham Jr. – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0NM3KQHO8c)

The Bible tells us we are commanded to choose to love.

In Matthew 22:36-40 (NIV), Jesus commanded love when He was asked:

36 “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?”

37 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’[a] 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[b] 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”

First Corinthians 13 is famous as the “Love Chapter.” Many of us have heard these words spoken at weddings:

“4 Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. 5 It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. 8 Love never fails.”

Romans 13 also speaks of the commandment to love, and how loving one another fulfills the law.

“8 Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for whoever loves others has fulfilled the law. 9 The commandments, “You shall not commit adultery,” “You shall not murder,” “You shall not steal,” “You shall not covet,” and whatever other command there may be, are summed up in this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself.” 10 Love does no harm to a neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of the law.”

First Peter 3 contains the famous instruction (verse 15) that we should each be Apologists. It, too, speaks of love:

1 Pet 3: 8-16 (NIV): “8 Finally, all of you, be like-minded, be sympathetic, love one another, be compassionate and humble. 9 Do not repay evil with evil or insult with insult. On the contrary, repay evil with blessing, because to this you were called so that you may inherit a blessing. 10 For, “Whoever would love life and see good days must keep their tongue from evil and their lips from deceitful speech. 11 They must turn from evil and do good; they must seek peace and pursue it. 12 For the eyes of the Lord are on the righteous and his ears are attentive to their prayer, but the face of the Lord is against those who do evil.” 13 Who is going to harm you if you are eager to do good? 14 But even if you should suffer for what is right, you are blessed. “Do not fear their threats; do not be frightened.” 15 But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect, 16 keeping a clear conscience, so that those who speak maliciously against your good behavior in Christ may be ashamed of their slander.”

Let’s choose to make every day a Biblical Valentine’s Day!

 

© 2018 Michael S. Oswald

 

 

Being a Winsome Apologist and Evangelist

Why We Need Apologetics and Evangelism.

We live in a culture that is increasingly hostile to anything that smacks of religion, especially the Christian faith. Before we get the chance to share the Gospel (Evangelism), we must make the case to the skeptic that there are valid reasons for our faith (Apologetics).

Chris Brooks is the senior pastor of Evangel Ministries and also the founder and president of the Detroit Bible Institute. Pastor Brooks explained the inter-workings of Evangelism and Apologetics in the following excerpt from an October 3, 2014 interview with Black Christian News:

“Is there a distinction between apologetics and evangelism?

They are both two sides of the same coin. Evangelism is the goal. C.S. Lewis said, “Apologetics is removing the rubble.” It is clearing away the intellectual and emotional barriers. For instance, many have intellectual questions such as “Is the Bible reliable?” Apologetics helps to answer those questions.

It is not about presenting a good argument or winning an argument, we are not trying to be the Great Debaters. Like I say in my book, “Apologetics without evangelism is aimless.” When people are evangelizing and sharing the gospel you do not have to motivate them to dig into apologetics. They want to because they want to provide a reasonable defense for their faith in order to win someone to Christ.

At the same time evangelism without apologetics is defenseless. If people have questions and we cannot provide a reasonable answer our evangelism may come to a halt.”

Please see the entire interview here: http://blackchristiannews.com/2014/10/chris-brooks-talks-apologetics-urban-perspective-new-book-urban-apologetics/

Why We Need to Be Winsome.

The Apostle Peter instructed us: “but sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and reverence;” (1 Pet 3:15).

The Apostle Paul spoke similarly: “Let your speech always be with grace, as though seasoned with salt, so that you will know how you should respond to each person.” (Col. 4:6).

Being winsome helps us to carry out these directions!

The Oxford Dictionaries define winsome as: Attractive or appealing in a fresh, innocent way. ‘a winsome smile.’

According toThesaurus.com, synonyms for winsome include: appealing, captivating, delightful, engaging, absorbing, elegant, lovable, pleasant, and winning.

How to Be Winsome.

One way to be winsome in a conversation with a skeptic is to ask questions rather than make statements (especially if the skeptic is likely to perceive the statement as antagonistic).  In Chapter three of his book Tactics, Gregory Koukl explains how and why to use questions.  Here are summaries of three reasons:

  1. Asking a question shows you are interested in the other person’s reasoning.
  1. It can cause the other person (possibly for the first time) to examine the basis for their opinion.
  1. It gives you the opportunity calmly to respond to a hostile challenge.

Asking “What do mean by that?” is an excellent tool for effective communication. It helps you avoid mistakes in your own responses.

For example, the skeptic may assert that “evolution is a proven fact!”

Instead of exclaiming “No it is not!” ask: “What do you mean by evolution?”  The skeptic may then cite the example of how dog breeders have developed new varieties of dogs, which is an illustration of micro-evolution.  Micro-evolution is simply changes within a given species, and it has been repeatedly demonstrated over time. You can then say that you agree that this type of evolution is indeed a proven fact.

If instead you had assumed the skeptic was referring to macro-evolution, (changes from one species into another), you might have needlessly engaged in a heated argument. As far as I know, macro-evolution has never been demonstrated.

Conclusion.

We need to be prepared, which means knowing what we believe and why we believe it.  We also need to be winsome, which is a lot easier to do if we are prepared!

For more on this vital topic, please enjoy Oxford mathematics Prof. John Lennox’s presentation: “Being a Winsome Apologist.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwOpsOudaA8&t=2609s

John shows us how to give our answers with gentleness and respect; he also explains the highly effective Q&A technique he employs during presentations.

In His Name,

Michael Oswald

michael@msochartered.com

© 2018 Michael S. Oswald

 

Reasons for the Faith, aka Apologetics

The purposes of this blog are (a) to fulfill the command in 1 Peter 3:15-16 always to be ready with an answer for the hope that we have, doing so with gentleness and respect; and (b) to help the Church in the USA to prepare its young people to keep their faith in an increasingly hostile culture.

This blog will provide content the blogger deems helpful to people who want to develop skills in Apologetics. It will also include pointers to other helpful blogs, websites, etc.

Visitors with differing views are invited to participate in a calm, reasoned conversation. Visitors who violate that spirit will be blocked.

Below is a list of diverse Apologists from across the USA.

 

Apologist Description; Links
Adam Coleman Apologist and Podcast Host;

“Tru-ID is my effort to contribute to the ongoing dialogue within our culture concerning topics like Christianity, race, morality, politics, and the merits of the Christian faith. On this journey we’re all about sharing the gospel of Christ as we learn, grow, and tackle tough questions. Come along for the ride!”

Tru-ID Podcast –  www.truidpodcast.com

Natasha Crain Christian Parenting Author, Blogger & Speaker; Book – “Keeping Your Kids on God’s Side: 40 conversations that help them build a lasting faith.”

http://christianmomthoughts.com/christian-parenting-blog/

Tim Mackie The Bible Project. Tim is a young professor & former teaching pastor who lives in Portland.  He is a gifted communicator. http://www.timmackie.com
Mama Bear Apologetics 3 moms providing accessible Apologetics resources for busy moms on the go.

http://mamabearapologetics.com

Truthbomb Apologetics “Welcome! Truthbomb Apologetics strives to offer apologetics resources to encourage and challenge both believer and unbeliever.” Lots of free resources, including scores of ebooks on a wide range of Apologetics-related topics.”

http://truthbomb.blogspot.com

J. Warner Wallace Former Cold Case homicide detective (and former Atheist) who used his detective skills to evaluate the evidence for Christianity.  http://coldcasechristianity.com/

© Michael S. Oswald – 2017