How to Build a More Discerning, Less Naïve, and Better Culturally Engaged Church

Natasha Crain, an Excellent Resource for the Kingdom.

I have featured author and apologetics instructor Natasha Crain in two of my previous posts: Equipping the Next Generation and Equipping the Next Generation, Update.

Natasha recently wrote an article titled How to Build a More Discerning, Less Naïve, and Better Culturally Engaged Church. I encourage everyone who is concerned about the hostile culture to read and heed her guidance.

http://christianmomthoughts.com/how-to-build-a-more-discerning-less-naive-and-better-culturally-engaged-church/

Awakening the Church to the Need for Cultural Engagement.

Natasha is a former Marketing executive.  She draws on that expertise in her timely article. The following paragraphs are the second and third in the article:

“Let me start by saying that the title of this article is a rather sweeping proposition. Obviously, this is a single article, the issues are complex, and I’m not claiming that what I write here is a complete answer to all the problems we have. But I want to offer what I see as some key levers needed to drive change in how Christians engage with today’s culture.” (emphasis added)

“In my years as a marketing executive, I came to deeply appreciate one particular model that people in the marketing field have used for over one hundred years (in various shapes and forms). It’s a simple funnel that describes the psychological stages people go through before committing to an action:” Awareness, Interest, Desire, Action. (this is the funnel graphic summarized.)

“If we want to move more Christians to the bottom of the funnel—the action point of being more discerning, less naïve, and better culturally engaged—here are the key levers I see at the awareness, interest, and desire points leading there.”

  1. Grow awareness of worldview differences by addressing biblical illiteracy.

“If a person doesn’t realize that their understanding of the Bible lacks appropriate context and depth, they end up navigating the stormy cultural waters in whatever way happens to make sense to them based on what they think the Bible says. Ironically, without an accurate biblical anchor, their Christian views get completely watered down by the cultural waves…and discernment no longer functions effectively. They’re less able to engage effectively with culture because they aren’t even fully aware of how a biblical and secular worldview really differ.”

  1. Grow interest in cultural engagement by addressing (lack of) conviction.

“Even if a person gains a better understanding of what the Bible says on relevant cultural topics (the awareness I just addressed), it doesn’t mean they’ll be interested enough to become culturally engaged. There could be many reasons for that, but there’s one that’s especially problematic: a lack of conviction that Christianity is objectively (and exclusively) true.”

  1. Grow desire for engagement by destigmatizing the relationship between politics and religion.

“Let’s now say that we have a person who is aware of what the Bible says on today’s hot topics and they’re interested in engaging culture because they’re convicted that the Bible offers the one true picture of reality.

That doesn’t mean they’ll actually do something.

Marketers are well aware that awareness and interest do not always lead to a strong desire to do something because there’s often some kind of barrier. There are a lot of barriers I could list here with respect to cultural engagement, but a major one I’ve seen is the prevailing stigma about mixing politics and religion.”

Action Requests

  1. Please go read the whole article, pick one of her suggested actions from the end of the article, and

 

  1. Send me an email letting me know what you intend to do. I will create a prayer list specifically for these actions.

Thank you, and God bless you.

Michael Oswald

michael@msochartered.com

www.msochartered.com

Michael Oswald is a follower of Jesus who lives in Boise, Idaho.  Unless otherwise specified, the opinions expressed in this article are his own.

© 2020 Michael S. Oswald

 

Equipping the Next Generation, Update

In my post of 8/22/2018 on Equipping the Next Generation, I wrote about Natasha Crain and all the work she is doing to help equip churches to equip parents to equip their kids in the faith. Whew!

At that time, Natasha had written two books, titled Keeping Your Kids on God’s Side and Talking with Your Kids About God.

Natasha is about to release her third book: Talking with Your Kids About Jesus. It is set to release on March 31,2020.  I encourage everyone to pre-order it.

Talking with Your Kids About Jesus differs from Talking with Your Kids About God in the following ways:

Talking with Your Kids About God focuses on evidence for God’s existence while Talking with Your Kids About Jesus focuses on Jesus’ identity, teachings, death, resurrection, and the difference that Jesus makes.

Thank you!

Michael Oswald

michael@msochartered.com

www.msochartered.com

Michael Oswald is a follower of Jesus who lives in Boise, Idaho.  Unless otherwise specified, the opinions expressed in this article are his own.

© 2020 Michael S. Oswald

 

The Church can Work to Eliminate Racism

How the Church can Work to Eliminate Racism

We, the Church, have an opportunity to work together to eliminate racism.

The Church (i.e., we who follow Jesus) can (1) proclaim the truth of Scripture that we are all one race; (2) expose the lies that enable racism; and (3) preach the Gospel as the ultimate cure for the sin of racism.

Racism is a Sin that Requires a Divine Cure

Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis thinks we would do away with racism if we all recognized that we are all brothers and sisters, and then treated each other accordingly.

“At the central core of racism, we find the sinful hearts of men living in a fallen world. This fundamental problem has no earthly cure. There is no speech that can be given, no law that can be passed, and no publicity campaign that can solve it. Only the truth of God’s Word combined with the strength of God’s Holy Spirit living within us can bring us victory over this sin.”

– Charles Ware; Ken Ham.
One Race One Blood, pp. 38

Yes, we are all One Race.

From the Evidence Bible’s daily post on 6/11/19:

“Science may have caught up with the Bible, which says that Adam and Eve are the ancestors of all humans alive today.”

Peter Underhill of Stanford University in California remarked on findings published in the November 2000 issue of the journal Nature Genetics…Geneticists have long agreed there is no genetic basis to race—only to ethnic and geographic groups. “People look at a very conspicuous trait like skin color and they say, ‘Well, this person’s so different’…but that’s only skin deep,” Underhill said. “When you look at the level of the Y chromosome you find that, gee, there is very little difference between them. And skin color differences are strictly a consequence of climate.”

“When the families scattered from Babel, they each took different combinations of genes with them. In such small populations, trivial differences (such as skin color) can arise quickly in only a few generations. Even evolutionists admit this is true. But different shades of skin and slightly different genetic traits are trivial and do not constitute different ‘races.’” Carl Kerby, Answers in Genesis 

 Acts 17:26 And He has made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, and has determined their pre-appointed times and the boundaries of their dwellings.”

See: We are all of the same race—the “human race.”

Here’s How to Treat Each Other as Brothers and Sisters:

Dr. Voddie Baucham, in his sermon title One Blood, explores how racism has roots in Evolutionary theory.  He shows that it matters very much whether one accepts the One Blood hypothesis described in Genesis.

The basis of all the ethnic divisions we have seen is the denial of the One Blood, One Race hypothesis.

The solution, he says, is in taking literally what God’s Word says in Genesis. Adam and Eve were literal, not symbolic, people. Noah was a literal person from whom all humans are descended. The flood was a literal flood. It was through the sons of Noah that we derived the various types of people.

If we accept what the Bible says, what does that mean for how we (the Church) act?

  1. We celebrate all are one in Adam and in Noah.
  1. Also, we celebrate that we are one in Christ.
  1. We refuse to allow faulty thinking about race to divide and separate us.
  1. We recognize that all racism is a sin, even in ourselves.
  1. We stop using race as a category. We can talk about ethnicity instead, and then use that point to open up opportunities to get into the Gospel.
  1. We can acknowledge our culture but advance the Kingdom.

One Lord, one faith, one baptism.  If we believe that, it should impact how we communicate “out there,” treat people “out there,” and what we expect from people “out there.”

– Dr. Voddie Baucham – One Blood – Sermon Library – 9/30/17

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ5JZ9MUfKA

Conclusion

We have an opportunity to impact the culture. Let’s seize it!

Michael Oswald

michael@msochartered.com

www.msochartered.com

Michael Oswald is a follower of Jesus who lives in Boise, Idaho.  Unless otherwise specified, the opinions expressed in this article are his own.

© 2019 Michael S. Oswald

Thinking and Communicating Foundationally

I wrote in The Authority of Scripture, that it matters what Christians believe about Genesis.

Genesis Chapters 1 – 11: God’s Eyewitness Account is our sure Foundation.

It also matters that we have a clear understanding of the foundation that Genesis chapters 1-11 provides for the Gospel, and indeed for all aspects of our faith.

Genesis 1:26-28 explains that God created human beings in His image, male & female. In

Genesis 2:20-25, God also defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

Genesis 3:1-24 illustrates how sin and death entered the world, and that we need a Savior to spare us from the consequences of our sins.

Genesis 6:9 – 8:22 narrates the events of the worldwide flood, which explains the existence of the worldwide fossil record.

Genesis 9:18-19 and 10:1-32 show that there is only one race – the human race.  We all came from Noah’s sons and daughters-in-law.  The modern science of Genetics, via the Human Genome Project, affirms the Bible’s teaching on that.

Genesis 11:1-9 records that all the different people groups were scattered across the earth away from the Tower of Babel, where climate factors such as heat and cold led to the variations in skin tone and other surface characteristics we now observe.

Communicating Between the Competing Foundations.

Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis demonstrated the importance of understanding one’s own Biblical foundation, and of recognizing the different foundation that dominates our culture.  He described how to have a calm discussion over some often-heated issues.

Ken gave a speech at the University of Central Oklahoma in front of an audience that included many who were hostile to Ken and his message.  Ken took the time gently to explain what he believes and why he believes it.  He then acknowledged that people who have the foundation of man’s word instead of God’s word will understandably come to different conclusions about issues such as gender, marriage, and abortion.

He then stressed our common humanity, stating: we are all related.  The audience actually applauded that observation!

See: The Relevance of Genesis in a Secular World with Ken Ham for all the details.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPOiy4xtUPM

Teaching the Generations to Think Foundationally

We live in a culture that constantly reinforces the “man’s word” foundation.  Our schools, universities, government agencies, public libraries, TV, movies, and social media operate from those assumptions.  The culture is openly hostile to God’s word.

We must remain vigilant to spot the atheistic assumptions that are presented as scientific fact, such as Darwinian evolution. We also need to be diligent to teach our kids and grandkids the skeptics’ common objections and the Biblical answers to them.  People walk away from the faith when the skeptical objections go unanswered.  If the objections go unanswered, they must be true, right?

We need to learn the common objections such as: “Science has proven there is no God;” and “a loving God wouldn’t allow so much evil and suffering.” We also need to learn the Biblically sound answers to those objections.  Finally, we need to train our kids and grandkids in how to recognize and respond to the objections.

Conclusion

Our marching orders as Apologists come from 1 Peter 3:15-16, where we are instructed always to be ready with an answer for anyone who asks for the hope we have, and to do so with gentleness and respect.

I think Ken gives us a great example to follow.

Thank you!

Michael Oswald

michael@msochartered.com

www.msochartered.com

Michael Oswald is a follower of Jesus who lives in Boise, Idaho.  Unless otherwise specified, the opinions expressed in this article are his own.

© 2019 Michael S. Oswald

 

The Inerrancy of Scripture

 It matters what Christians Believe About the Inerrancy of Scripture.

John MacArthur of Ligonier Ministries answers the question: “What would you say to a Christian who denies the inerrancy of Scripture?”

See this 9:30 video produced by Genesis Apologetics on the Reliability of Scripture.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAH_-Du2428

MacArthur comes in at roughly the 6:57 mark.  He spells out the serious consequences that flow from believing that the Bible is not inerrant:

  1. You are denying God’s own claims for the Bible

 

  1. You are denying what the Holy Spirit, the author of Scripture, says about Scripture (that all Scripture is given by the inspiration of God; that every word is pure; that Scripture is God-breathed.)

 

  1. You are denying every time in Scripture that it says “thus says The Lord…”

 

  1. You are denying the overall superintending power of God over His Revelation.

 

  1. It says that you are the judge of Scripture. You just made yourself the authority over the Bible. You’re the one we have to trust to tell us what’s true and not true in the Bible.

 

  1. The only reason you deny inerrancy is because there is something in the Bible you don’t like. You’ve then said that “what the Bible says can’t be true.”

 

  1. Once you’ve broken a link in the chain of Scripture, how do we know that anything in it is true? When the Bible claims inspiration for all of it, and you break that, what do you do? How do you trust any of it?

 

  1. You could say you don’t believe in the Biblical account of Creation, that you believe in evolution instead. Evolution isn’t in Genesis.  the question then becomes If that’s not true, what else isn’t, and who is the person who will tell us what is and isn’t true?

 

  1. You literally unravel the Scripture if you Deny it’s inerrancy.

What is Biblical Inerrancy?

According to https://www.theopedia.com/inerrancy:

Inerrancy is the view that when all the facts become known, they will demonstrate that the Bible in its original autographs and correctly interpreted is entirely true and never false in all it affirms, whether that relates to doctrines or ethics or to the social, physical, or life sciences.”[1] The conservative evangelical stance on inerrancy was most recently and thoroughly articulated in 1978 in the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy.

For a longer exploration of Biblical inspiration and inerrancy, see:

https://answersingenesis.org/is-the-bible-true/why-should-we-believe-in-the-inerrancy-of-scripture/

Conclusion

As Apologists, we are called on always to be ready with an answer (1 Pet. 3:15).  I think readiness includes having a firm grasp on why we have the confidence that we have in God’s Word.

Thank you!

Michael Oswald

michael@msochartered.com

www.msochartered.com

Michael Oswald is a follower of Jesus who lives in Boise, Idaho.  Unless otherwise specified, the opinions expressed in this article are his own.

© 2019 Michael S. Oswald

The Authority of Scripture

It matters what Christians believe about Genesis.

Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis (A.I.G.) has helped me understand why it matters whether or not Christians believe what Genesis says about the creation of the heavens and the earth.

Do we accept God’s eyewitness testimony about His creation, or do we allow man’s interpretation to rule instead?

The Devil led Adam and Eve to sin by questioning God’s word.  “Did God really say…?”

The Devil is still using what Ken calls a Genesis 3 attack on God’s word.  Now he is getting us to question whether God really created the world in six 24-hour days.

He is very cleverly using the words of scientists to intimidate us with the false dichotomy of “God or Science.”  Nobody wants to be branded as “anti-science.”

Our schools have adopted the religion of atheistic naturalism.  Darwinian macro-evolution is taught as if were scientifically proven.  The Bible is characterized as mythology.  These factors no doubt contribute to the 60%+ attrition rate of our young people abandoning the faith.

If Christians accept the Darwinian assertion that the earth is millions of years old, we are telling our children that we don’t trust God’s word on the subject of the creation.  We should not be surprised that they have stopped trusting the rest of scripture.

Answers in Genesis has answers to the skeptics’ questions about creation.

We need to equip our kids with answers to the questions asked by those who are hostile to God.

According to the A.I.G. website https://answersingenesis.org/

“Answers in Genesis is an apologetics (i.e., Christianity-defending) ministry, dedicated to enabling Christians to defend their faith and to proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ effectively. We focus particularly on providing answers to questions surrounding the book of Genesis, as it is the most-attacked book of the Bible. We also desire to train others to develop a biblical worldview, and seek to expose the bankruptcy of evolutionary ideas, and its bedfellow, a “millions of years old” earth (and even older universe).”

A.I.G. produces and disseminates comprehensive research.  It employs or otherwise collaborates with a wide range of scientists, including Dr. Georgia Purdom (PhD in molecular genetics – Ohio State University) Dr. Gabriela Haynes (Ph.D. in Geology/Paleontology – Federal University of Ceará State in Brazil), and Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson (PhD in cell and developmental biology -Harvard University).

Please check out Ken’s presentation: “Communicating the Christian Message in a Secularized Culture,” where he gives a succinct explanation of the new obstacles our culture poses to preaching the Gospel in it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiRcY08hMg0&t=1483s

Conclusion

There are scores of Godly men and women toiling in the Apologetics vineyard. A.I.G. is tending one of the rows that, in my opinion, has been somewhat neglected.

I encourage you to add their ministry to your list of resources.

Thank you!

Michael Oswald

michael@msochartered.com

www.msochartered.com

Michael Oswald is a follower of Jesus who lives in Boise, Idaho.  Unless otherwise specified, the opinions expressed in this article are his own.

© 2019 Michael S. Oswald

 

Equipping the Next Generation

I attended the Cross-Examined Instructors Academy 2018 (“CIA”) in Dallas last week.  Frank Turek and his team really know how to put on a high-impact event!

Let’s All Help Equip Parents to Equip Their Kids.

I came away with crystal clarity that the highest Return On Investment for Apologists is for us to equip parents to equip their children to learn the Bible and confidently explain the reasons for the faith. This will go a long way toward reversing the heart-breaking trend of 60%+ of Christian kids leaving the faith after high school.

Natasha Crain’s Solution.

Natasha Crain, http://christianmomthoughts.com/, focuses on Christian Parenting. She told her story of starting a blog six years ago.  She didn’t even know what Apologetics was at that time, but after getting hostile posts from several skeptics, she learned!

Natasha explained how our failure to learn Apologetics and teach it to our kids has resulted in the above-mentioned loss of 60%+ of our kids.  If we don’t teach them the truth and teach them how to spot the lies that skeptics use, we leave them vulnerable. We need to prepare them in advance for the attacks that are coming.

Now, she helps parents bridge the gap between what Apologetics is, why it is important, and how to teach their kids. She helps parents respond to the challenges from skeptics. She observed that intellectual-sounding questions from skeptics cause kids to leave Christianity if they aren’t equipped to respond.

She has developed a 5-step method for parents to use in equipping their kids:

  1. Commit to continually deepening their own understanding of Christianity and other world views such as Atheism.
  1. Use teachable moments that come along AND create teachable moments of their own. Doing more of Step #1 creates more moments. Set aside 30 minutes each week to grow together as a family.
  1. Study the Bible with their kids.
  1. Regularly ask their kids what questions they have about Christianity. Parents needn’t fear questions, because Christianity is true!
  1. Ask their kids the tough questions they aren’t asking the parents.

 Proliferating the Solution.

Natasha just announced the Grassroots Apologetics for Parents (GAP) ministry she and her team are launching this fall. they have 40 chapters of GAP rolling out internationally in the pilot.

See here for more information: https://www.womeninapologetics.com/gap-program-kicks-off-this-fall/

How Can You Help Equip the Next Generation?

Please share this blog post with your networks of fellow Christ-followers.

Please also share news of other efforts that are focused on equipping parents to equip their kids.

Thank you!

Michael Oswald

michael@msochartered.com

www.msochartered.com

Michael Oswald is a follower of Jesus who lives in Boise, Idaho.  Unless otherwise specified, the opinions expressed in this article are his own.

© 2018 Michael S. Oswald

 

How do we Know Christianity is True?

Why the Truth of Christianity Matters.

Parents, do you know how to keep your kids from becoming Atheists when they go off to college? Start training them early on about all the reasons to believe Christianity is true.

Proverbs 22:6 tells us we are to “Train up a child in the way he should go, even when he is old he will not depart from it.”

Training is different from teaching, as J. Warner Wallace wrote in his book Forensic Faith. He used the illustration of preparing for a boxing match.  If you are only interested in learning about boxing, you can read a book on the subject.  However, once a boxing match has been placed on the calendar, the boxer immediately starts getting into physical and mental condition to win the match.

Think of your child’s first year of college as boxing match. She is going to be in an environment that is openly hostile to the Christian faith.  She needs to go through a long process of learning all the reasons to believe that Christianity is true. She also needs to practice the art of responding effectively to things that Atheists often say.

The popular culture is dominated by people who hold the Materialist world view.  Entertainment, education, and government all teach that faith is hostile to science and should not be allowed in the public square.  They define faith as “blind faith,” or “faith in spite of the evidence.”

Many of the people she will encounter will parrot things they hear popular Atheists such as Prof. Richard Dawkins say. Dawkins (among others) claims that faith is hostile to science. By respectfully asking (1) what do you mean by that? And (2) how did you come to that conclusion? It is possible to get them to realize that Atheism doesn’t have a very solid foundation. See the book Tactics by Greg Koukl for more on using what he calls The Columbo Tactic.

How Can We Know Christianity is True?

Frank Turek is co-author of the book I Don’t Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist.  He says you only have to answer four questions in the affirmative to know that Christianity is True:

  1. Does Truth Exist?

Post-modernists say there is no truth, while making the claim that post-modernism is true.

If someone says there is no such thing as truth, ask them: “Is that a true statement?”

If there is no truth, then anything written by an Atheist can’t be true.

You can’t get away from truth. It is objective and absolute.

  1. Does God Exist?

There is a lot of evidence God exists, including scientific, historical, and logical evidence.

The scientific evidence known as the Big Bang shows that time, space, and matter all had a beginning. There was nothing, and then the entire space-time continuum leapt into existence out of nothing.  (In the words of Aristotle, “Nothing is what rocks dream about.”)

Even Atheists admit that time, space, and matter had a beginning.  Logic and reason tell you that anything which comes into existence must have a cause (or a creator).  Nothing can cause itself to come into being.  Therefore, whatever caused time, space and matter to exist must be timeless, space-less, and immaterial.  It must also be personal, in order to make the choice to create something. It must also be incredibly intelligent and incredibly powerful to be able to create everything out of nothing.

  1. Are Miracles Possible?

The greatest miracle of all is in the first verse of the Bible – in the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.  If this is true, anything else that is not logically impossible is at least possible. Walking on water is easy for God – He created the water! God created life from non-life.  He can raise someone from the dead.

  1. Is the New Testament True?

Here is a summary of the reasons we can trust that the New Testament writers were telling the truth. The testimony was:

Eyewitness (the writers were either apostles of Jesus or people who spoke to the apostles and to others who knew Jesus);

Early (written while many other witnesses were available to refute any lies or errors);

Embarrassing (containing unflattering details the authors would not have invented);

Excruciating (some writers were tortured and killed for refusing to recant what they knew to be true about Jesus), and

Expected (the Old Testament contained many prophesies about the Messiah – see Isaiah Chapter 53).

If you are ready to sink your teeth into the evidence for the truth of Christianity, read the book I Don’t Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist.

 

 

Do All Religions Teach the Same Things?

A common myth permeating the secular culture is that all religions basically teach the same things, so Christianity isn’t really the only way to God (or to heaven, or to know the truth).

It is important to know that the different religions do NOT agree with that assertion. The basic beliefs of Pantheism, Islam, (and Materialism, for that matter) differ wildly from the Judeo-Christian worldview.

Further, only Christianity teaches salvation by grace and not by works.

Christian Apologist Ravi Zacharias (a former Hindu who grew up in India) is a master at helping separate fact from fiction in this regard.

I encourage everyone to view this brief (11:46) video with the unfortunate title “Ravi SCHOOLS a Skeptic at Yale University Q&A”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNuYJw_T350&t=134s

This title was selected by the person who posted the clip.  It was not one chosen by Ravi or his team at RZIM. I say the title is unfortunate because it is unnecessarily combative.  We are called to be winsome Apologists (please see my January 17, 2018 post on that very topic). 

In response to the question of “What entitles us to believe that the Christian Faith is the exclusive means to truth?” Ravi first defines truth and what it means to know the truth.

Starting at the 4:15 mark, he explains what makes Jesus unique.

The Gospel meta-narrative is unique.  Everything is designed to show that the problem with humanity is not outside ourselves, but inside ourselves. We have lost the purpose for which we were created, namely, to be in relationship with God.  Jesus said that the greatest commandment is to love the Lord with all your heart, soul, mind & strength, and love your neighbor as yourself.  On these two commands hang all the law and the prophets (in other words, the entire Old Testament). That imperative is unavailable from any other world view. We are made in the imago dei and are of infinite worth.  We are all creatures in need of forgiveness.

The four absolutes we look for (evil, justice, love, and forgiveness) are answered in the life, death, crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus. These attributes about Jesus were prophesied, predicted, and exactly fulfilled.

Why does this matter to Americans? Only the Judeo-Christian worldview supports the Declaration of Independence.” Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights”.  Pantheism doesn’t say that. Materialism doesn’t say that. Not even Islam says that. Only the Judeo-Christian worldview offers each of us intrinsic worth. Read the Gospel of John for the full story of Jesus.

Atheistic Materialism when taken to its honest and logical outworking ends with all life being nothing more than accident and chance. Even according to Atheist Richard Dawkins we are the products of blind pitiless indifference, machines of accidental happenstance. This logically means that things like morality, self- sacrifice, and justice are made up by humans and are of no real consequence. We know intrinsically that truth can be felt much more deeply by looking honestly at the world around us. We are not accidents of molecules bumping into one another, we are created beings of immense value and are loved by our Creator. Either human life has value and morality is just as real as the air we breathe, or it’s not and it’s just a difference of opinion between those who murder and those who love.

 

The “Minimal Facts” Approach to the New Testament

How do you respond to a skeptic who asserts that Jesus never existed, or if He did, He certainly never rose from the dead?

Dr. Gary Habermas created an approach to help those skeptics at least be willing to consider that there is reliable historical evidence for the resurrection of Jesus.  He dubbed it the “Minimal Facts” approach.

Dr. Habermas developed this method while doing research for his Ph.D. at Michigan State University.  He noticed that there are five facts about the resurrection that Biblical scholars (including Atheists and Agnostics) accept as true:

  1. Jesus died.
  2. His disciples believed they saw the risen Jesus.
  3. James the skeptical brother also believed.
  4. Paul the persecutor also believed.
  5. Jesus’s tomb was empty.

I urge you to invest just under an hour to watch him lay out the approach and how he derived it.  I think he is a very entertaining and enlightening presenter!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMGLPR5X8MM Part 1 of 2 (29:57)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RISjr29gpaQ Part 2 of 2 (24:07)

Gary Habermas is the Distinguished Professor of Apologetics and Philosophy and chairman, Department of Philosophy and Theology, at Liberty University.